It is a little, and if raises several ethical and moral questions we still have to find good answers to.
However looking at it from a purely technological viewpoint the improvement we should see to quality of life should be incredible too. It's about trying to find a good balance and way of integrating the new technology into society.
Depends. Science in general is neutral - it's what humans do with discoveries that make them good or evil.
World War 1 saw a great deal of advancement in medical science but I would think most people would have preferred a slower curve of discovery to the vast amount of lives that were lost.
Computers are only as good or evil as we make them. Fear as a response is understandable and inevitable but I think it may also be the wrong approach.
If we great new life with violence I think we are doomed to make of it the enemy we most fear.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
xp_wallflower) wrote2015-09-03 04:54 pm
no subject
no subject
However looking at it from a purely technological viewpoint the improvement we should see to quality of life should be incredible too. It's about trying to find a good balance and way of integrating the new technology into society.
no subject
World War 1 saw a great deal of advancement in medical science but I would think most people would have preferred a slower curve of discovery to the vast amount of lives that were lost.
Computers are only as good or evil as we make them. Fear as a response is understandable and inevitable but I think it may also be the wrong approach.
If we great new life with violence I think we are doomed to make of it the enemy we most fear.