Page Summary
x-deadpool.livejournal.com - (no subject)
x-cypher.livejournal.com - (no subject)
x-wallflower-.livejournal.com - (no subject)
x-deadpool.livejournal.com - (no subject)
x-wallflower-.livejournal.com - (no subject)
x-blink.livejournal.com - (no subject)
x-wallflower-.livejournal.com - (no subject)
x-adrienne.livejournal.com - (no subject)
x-wallflower-.livejournal.com - (no subject)
x-wallflower-.livejournal.com - (no subject)
x-blink.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2015-05-09 06:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-05-09 07:12 am (UTC)I have completely failed.
So yeah, what Wade said.
no subject
Date: 2015-05-09 08:02 am (UTC)Although - why people went along with shocking a puppy, I don't know.
no subject
Date: 2015-05-09 08:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-05-09 08:03 am (UTC)It is a good illustration of why we should always question orders we don't agree with - no matter who they come from.
no subject
Date: 2015-05-09 11:43 am (UTC)and on that note, I'm getting a puuppy. Just so this doesn't happen to another puppy. BRB, going to the shelter.
no subject
Date: 2015-05-09 12:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-05-09 03:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-05-10 02:03 am (UTC)There's always going to be a sociological issue with any kind of study like this. (Not that I'm saying anyone should repeat such a study just to see if the result changes depending on the year in which it's done/and the society based predjudices the subjects may or may not have. )
Also, there's no mention of socio-economic level of the participants, or if they're all from one country or multiple ones and the sample size in and of itself is not enough for it to be a true indication of anything, let along having verifiable data over multiple studies.
no subject
Date: 2015-05-10 02:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-05-10 02:22 am (UTC)